Call for Abs­tracts: Edi­ted Volu­me on Open Data in Trans­port Planning

Call for Abs­tracts: Edi­ted Volu­me (Open Access Book, Ber­lin Uni­ver­si­ty Press)

Data, Cities and Citi­zens: How open data revo­lu­tio­ni­zes urban and trans­port planning

 Insights from a dia­lo­gue bet­ween Euro­pe and Asia

  • Dead­line:  April 5, 2025

Edi­tors

  • Jonas Fahl­busch, Tech­ni­cal Uni­ver­si­ty Ber­lin, Chair for Work Stu­dies, Tech­no­lo­gy and Par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on & Rese­arch Cam­pus Mobility2Grid
  • Chang Yunt­sui, Natio­nal Tai­wan Uni­ver­si­ty, Depart­ment for Civil Engineering
  • Prof. Dr. Huang Liling, Natio­nal Tai­wan Uni­ver­si­ty, Gra­dua­te Insti­tu­te of Buil­ding and Planning
  • Prof. Dr. Jan-Dirk Schmöcker, Kyo­to Uni­ver­si­ty, Depart­ment for Urban Management
  • Prof. Dr. Hans-Liud­ger Die­nel, Tech­ni­cal Uni­ver­si­ty Ber­lin, Chair for Work Stu­dies, Tech­no­lo­gy and Participation

Over­view of the content

The pro­po­sed book explo­res the trans­for­ma­ti­ve power of open data in urban and trans­port plan­ning, exami­ning how it fos­ters a mul­ti­face­ted under­stan­ding of cities (for rese­arch and prac­ti­ce), influen­ces plan­ning, inte­gra­tes citi­zens and shapes urban spaces in diver­se regi­ons.  Open data — sourced from govern­ments, pri­va­te enti­ties, NGOs, and indi­vi­du­als — offers new oppor­tu­ni­ties for par­ti­ci­pa­to­ry plan­ning, data-dri­ven decis­i­on-making, and inter­di­sci­pli­na­ry col­la­bo­ra­ti­on. Howe­ver, its impact is shaped by local gover­nan­ce struc­tures, tech­no­lo­gi­cal capa­bi­li­ties, but also socie­tal, cul­tu­ral and indi­vi­du­al atti­tu­des toward trans­pa­ren­cy and data sha­ring. By ana­ly­zing com­pa­ra­ti­ve cases from Euro­pe and Asia, this volu­me aims to high­light diver­se approa­ches to open data uti­liza­ti­on and gover­nan­ce, fos­te­ring mutu­al lear­ning and inno­va­ti­ve appli­ca­ti­ons in the field. The idea for this book pro­ject ori­gi­na­ted from the #HackY­our­Dis­trict work­shop series, initia­ted by the Chair for Work Stu­dies, Tech­no­lo­gy, and Par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on at the Tech­ni­cal Uni­ver­si­ty of Ber­lin in 2021. Sin­ce then, the­se work­shops have faci­li­ta­ted inter­na­tio­nal dis­cus­sions on the oppor­tu­ni­ties and limi­ta­ti­ons of open data in plan­ning, con­sis­t­ent­ly reve­al­ing that data cul­tures (Rob Kit­chin 2014) vary not only bet­ween regi­ons but also within cities of the same coun­try. Buil­ding on the­se insights, this volu­me seeks to advan­ce the dis­cour­se on open data, explo­ring both its poten­ti­al and its chal­lenges in sha­ping more inclu­si­ve, sus­tainable and effi­ci­ent urban and trans­port systems.

Within the prac­ti­ces of dif­fe­rent cul­tures, it is indi­vi­du­als who use (open) data to crea­te new insights or deve­lop inno­va­tions (Cin­na­mon 2022). The human fac­tor plays a cen­tral role in data inno­va­tions, as the suc­cess and set­back of open data initia­ti­ves depends hea­vi­ly on the acti­ve par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on, con­trol, and under­stan­ding of the peo­p­le who pro­du­ce and use this data. A Tai­wan exam­p­le is the Road­kill Obser­va­ti­on Network (Tai­RON), whe­re citi­zens actively con­tri­bu­te to scientific rese­arch by using GPS-enab­led devices to crowd­sour­ce road­kill data. This inte­gra­ti­on of citi­zens into the data coll­ec­tion pro­cess not only fos­ters grea­ter public invol­vement but also enhan­ces the breadth and depth of con­ser­va­ti­on rese­arch (Hsu & Lin 2021). Simi­lar­ly, in Ger­ma­ny, the “Gieß den Kiez” (Water the Neigh­bor­hood) pro­ject in Ber­lin invi­tes citi­zens to use open data and GPS tech­no­lo­gy to moni­tor and water urban trees, allo­wing for a col­la­bo­ra­ti­ve effort in main­tai­ning the city’s green spaces and pro­mo­ting envi­ron­men­tal sus­taina­bi­li­ty. Howe­ver, despi­te the­se posi­ti­ve examp­les, it is important to reco­gni­ze that the relia­bi­li­ty and useful­ness of open data can also be com­pro­mi­sed by indi­vi­du­als who, whe­ther through error, lack of under­stan­ding, or poli­ti­cal­ly moti­va­ted mani­pu­la­ti­on, may inad­ver­t­ent­ly under­mi­ne the inte­gri­ty of open data (Mcard­le & Kit­chin 2016).

Nowhe­re else is as much data gene­ra­ted as in cities. If we take a clo­ser look, we rea­li­ze that in no other urban area is as much data gene­ra­ted as in trans­por­ta­ti­on. The sheer volu­me of move­ments of peo­p­le, goods and vehic­les and their net­wor­king with smart­phones, GPS and sen­sors pro­du­ce mas­si­ve amounts. When ope­ned to public use, data can sup­port the deve­lo­p­ment of open-source trans­port plan­ning tools (e.g. MAT­Sim, co-deve­lo­ped by Prof. Kai Nagel at TU Ber­lin). The­se tools faci­li­ta­te rou­te opti­miza­ti­on, demand fore­cas­ting and sce­na­rio ana­ly­sis, making trans­port plan­ning more effi­ci­ent and trans­pa­rent. The use of open data (and open tools) in trans­por­ta­ti­on sys­tems allows for the deve­lo­p­ment of new ser­vices and appli­ca­ti­ons that impro­ve the user expe­ri­ence and ser­vices. For exam­p­le, real-time data on bus loca­ti­ons and sche­du­les can enable bet­ter ser­vice design and ope­ra­tio­nal effi­ci­en­cy. Fur­ther­mo­re, in achie­ving the net-zero city agen­da, the appli­ca­ti­on of open data in trans­por­ta­ti­on sys­tems not only sup­ports inno­va­ti­ve trans­por­ta­ti­on plan­ning but also acce­le­ra­tes public com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on and faci­li­ta­tes social tran­si­ti­on in dai­ly life. For the­se reasons, we would like to explo­re the trans­for­ma­ti­ve power of open data equal­ly in the urban plan­ning and trans­port plan­ning disci­pli­nes ali­ke, which part­ly mer­ge into each other.

Most aca­de­mic works on open data and cities tend to approach the topic from a pre­do­mi­nant­ly Wes­tern-cen­tric per­spec­ti­ve, often roo­ted in dis­cus­sions about pri­va­ti­zed digi­tal spaces (Kit­chin et al. 2015) or about the per­va­si­ve influence of lar­ge tech cor­po­ra­ti­ons in sha­ping smart city tech­no­lo­gies and smart city dis­cour­ses (Burns 2021, Green­field 2013). The focus — though not new — over­looks cri­ti­cal per­spec­ti­ves on neo­li­be­ral urba­nism, which argue that the smart city model, as pro­mo­ted by tech giants, often prio­ri­ti­zes cor­po­ra­te inte­rests over public good, lea­ding to the com­mo­di­fi­ca­ti­on of urban data. Deri­ved from this, aca­de­mics like Kit­chin (2014) often argue that open data, when lever­a­ged effec­tively, can offer a coun­ter-nar­ra­ti­ve to the pri­va­ti­zed smart city model by fos­te­ring trans­pa­ren­cy, accoun­ta­bi­li­ty, and citi­zen par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on, that it is used in ways that empower rather than exploit urban popu­la­ti­ons. Our expe­ri­en­ces from #HackY­our­Dis­trict shows that the pro­duc­tion and sha­ring of digi­tal infor­ma­ti­on through civic tech­no­lo­gy is forming new com­mu­ni­ties and co-crea­ti­on, dri­ving mea­su­res such as air pol­lu­ti­on regu­la­ti­on, waters­hed manage­ment, bio­di­ver­si­ty con­ser­va­ti­on, health manage­ment (for a Tai­wa­ne­se case stu­dy exam­p­le see Yuan et al. 2020) and many other fields.

It is this effec­ti­ve lever­aging of open data that will be addres­sed in the edi­ted volu­me in the realm of urban plan­ning and trans­por­ta­ti­on. We want to tack­le wider issues rela­ted to open data in urban and trans­port plan­ning, dra­wing on scientific rese­arch results, poli­ti­cal ana­ly­sis, pro­ject reflec­tions, case stu­dies or artis­tic works. The book the­r­e­fo­re invi­tes rese­ar­chers and prac­ti­tio­ners who deal with cities, trans­por­ta­ti­on and open data and crea­ted inno­va­ti­ve approa­ches, fin­dings, methods or crea­ti­ve ways of open data usa­ge to enhan­ce plan­ning. We invi­te con­tri­bu­ti­ons not only from par­ti­ci­pan­ts of our work­shop series over the past three years but also from exter­nal aut­hors who­se insights can enhan­ce the qua­li­ty of our book pro­ject.

The book aims to cri­ti­cal­ly enga­ge with deba­tes from the huma­ni­ties, social sci­en­ces and engi­nee­ring to deli­ver a com­pre­hen­si­ve account of how data intert­wi­ne with urban envi­ron­men­tal chan­ges. We wel­co­me dis­cus­sions on both the posi­ti­ve and nega­ti­ve impacts of open data in cities. Despi­te the poten­ti­als that we high­ligh­ted and need so much for a coun­ter-nar­ra­ti­ve of capi­tal-dri­ven smart cities, we are also loo­king for cri­ti­cal reflec­tions of open data uti­liza­ti­on, e.g.: How the pri­va­tiza­ti­on of data obs­tructs urban / trans­port plan­ning, how open data might com­pro­mi­se citi­zens’ pri­va­cy rights, or how sta­tes might with­hold open data for poli­ti­cal pur­po­ses and con­se­quent­ly obs­tructs urban / trans­port planning.

We fur­ther wel­co­me con­tri­bu­ti­ons that explo­re the role of city admi­nis­tra­ti­ons and urban plan­ners in deve­lo­ping effi­ci­ent open data manage­ment sys­tems, as well as in lever­aging open data for the plan­ning and enhance­ment of infra­struc­tu­re. During our work­shops, we obser­ved that open data can act as a cata­lyst, spar­king col­la­bo­ra­ti­on among groups that pre­vious­ly had no inter­ac­tion, fos­te­ring new oppor­tu­ni­ties for coope­ra­ti­on and mutu­al lear­ning. Con­se­quent­ly, we warm­ly invi­te artic­les that exami­ne inno­va­ti­ve forms of co-pro­duc­tion dri­ven by data and emer­ging social net­works, par­ti­cu­lar­ly tho­se that illus­tra­te how the digi­tal sphe­re revi­ta­li­zes phy­si­cal spaces and enhan­ces social interactions.

The­mes and Topics

Con­tri­bu­ti­ons should ali­gn with one of the fol­lo­wing key themes:

  1. Open Data and Cities – Papers on how open data influen­ces urban envi­ron­ments, gover­nan­ce, civic enga­ge­ment, decis­i­on-making, inno­va­tions and urban poli­ci­es. Chal­lenges / solu­ti­ons in data acces­si­bi­li­ty, inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty, and equi­ty in urban data gover­nan­ce and management.
  2. Open Data and Urban Plan­ning – The role of open data in sha­ping spa­ti­al plan­ning, land-use decis­i­ons, and par­ti­ci­pa­to­ry design. Open data for moni­to­ring housing, envi­ron­men­tal sus­taina­bi­li­ty, and socio-spa­ti­al ine­qua­li­ties. Digi­tal twins and AI-based ana­ly­tics in plan­ning through open data sources. Chal­lenges / solu­ti­ons in data qua­li­ty, stan­dar­diza­ti­on, and long-term avai­la­bi­li­ty in urban planning.
  3. Open Data and Trans­port Plan­ning – The focus of this chap­ter is on describ­ing and pro­ving the impact or poten­ti­al prac­ti­cal value of open data on urban trans­por­ta­ti­on sys­tems. By making data acces­si­ble, plan­ners and rese­ar­chers can enhan­ce ser­vices and crea­te more citi­zen-cen­te­red mobi­li­ty solu­ti­ons. Oppor­tu­ni­ties and cases for this shall be dis­cus­sed as well as chal­lenges like data pri­va­cy, gover­nan­ce, inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty or pri­va­tiza­ti­on of data.
  4. Open Data and Citi­zens – How indi­vi­du­als and com­mu­ni­ties enga­ge with and con­tri­bu­te to open data initia­ti­ves, inclu­ding gover­nan­ce, data cul­tures, and par­ti­ci­pa­to­ry prac­ti­ces, or new methods of data crea­ti­on and appli­ca­ti­on (e.g. hacka­thons). Cri­ti­cal reflec­tions on citi­zen-dri­ven data initia­ti­ves and grass­roots urbanism.

We are espe­ci­al­ly inte­res­ted in con­tri­bu­ti­ons that cri­ti­cal­ly assess both the posi­ti­ve poten­ti­al and the chal­lenges asso­cia­ted with open data, such as pri­va­cy con­cerns, data pri­va­tiza­ti­on, and poli­ti­cal cons­traints on data availability.

Publi­ca­ti­on Timeline

  • Mar 20, 2025 – Call for Papers opens
  • Apr 5, 2025 – Abs­tract sub­mis­si­on deadline
  • Apr 15, 2025 – Noti­fi­ca­ti­on of abs­tract acceptance
  • Jun 30, 2025 – Full paper submission
  • Jul 1–15, 2025 – Edi­to­ri­al review
  • Jul 16, 2025 – Reviews sent to authors
  • Jul 31, 2025 – Dead­line for first revision
  • Aug 1–15, 2025 – Peer review by fel­low authors
  • Aug 15–31, 2025 – Final revisions
  • Sep 1, 2025 – Manu­script finalized
  • End of 2025 – Book release (Open Access)

Cont­act

Jonas Fahl­busch

Chair for Work, Tech­no­lo­gy and Par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on at Tech­ni­sche Uni­ver­si­tät Berlin
Rese­arch Cam­pus Mobility2Grid (Lead Know­ledge and Inno­va­ti­on Transfer)

E‑Mail: jonas.fahlbusch@tu-berlin.de